Mt Democrat reporter admitted that she got her information from the Hank White the General Manager at GDPUD. This is from the actual budget approved by the Board on June 15, 2012. The video (or in this case the picture) doesn't lie.
This article was written in response to my charges that GDPUD's salary is way out of whack with the District's revenues and way out of whack in comparison to the neighboring District's GM's Salary package.
First the Article:
GM compensation compared between GDPUD and EID
By Dawn Hodson
Board members and candidates for the board of the Georgetown Divide Public Utility District have made various claims regarding the salary and compensation package of General Manager Hank White as opposed to that of the general manager of the El Dorado Irrigation District, Jim Abercrombie.
Below are the salary and compensation figures provided to us by the two agencies.
Jim Abercrombie, general manager of EID, receives an annual salary of $165,000. Benefits include an auto allowance of $6,000, pension contribution of $13,200, Social Security and Medicare Tax of $9,881, Executive Wellness $2,500, and medical (including health, dental, vision, and EAP) of $31,802.
Altogether, his total compensation package is $228,383.
EID noted that in 2013, his medical payment will be reduced to approximately $19,840 due to Abercrombie voluntarily taking a lesser medical plan (which will bring his total compensation to $216,421.
In addition, Abercrombie annually receives 256 hours of paid time off (for sick leave and vacation usage) as well as 80 hours of Management Leave and one Personal Business Day.
Hank White, General Manager of GDPUD, receives an annual salary of $150,381. Benefits include use of a company vehicle (not valued) for emergency responses, Medical (including health, dental, vision) of $23,757 and life insurance of $294. He receives no contribution to his pension, Social Security, Medicare tax or Executive Wellness.
Altogether, his total compensation package is $174,432.
In addition, he receives 160 hours per year of vacation and 96 hours per year of sick leave.
Contact Dawn Hodson at 530-344-5071 or email@example.com. Follow @DHodsonMtDemo on Twitter.
Now the Comments posted in response to this article:
My opponent says that the "State" is trying to take our water rights away. Well in fact it is the Same old Group
"Westlands Water Agency."
A privately owned water agency that 'claims' to have thousands of 'customers' when in fact it is about 8 or 10 ranch owners who claim their 'Employees' as separate customers.
They are going nuts that fresh water is going in the Delta and maintaining the wild life and they can't sell it and make more $$$$.
Westlands Dumps Thousands Into Defeating Pro-Delta Congressional Candidates
by Dan Bacher
Friday Oct 19th, 2012 5:16 PM
Westlands Water District growers have benefitted for years from federally subsidized Delta water exports. Now, they are using the profits they have obtained from subsidized water, at tremendous expense to the taxpayers and the environment, to muscle political influence to secure future water supplies.
[How do they do that? This conglomerate buys up Mom-and-Pop Farms +
their water rights + the Federal Subsidies to help Mom-an-Pop business
survive. The Conglomerate keeps the Water Rights + the Federal Subsidies
to those rights, and continues to collect Tax $$$ intended for Mom-and-Pop
A review of Federal Election Commission records has exposed an effort by the politically powerful Westlands Water District to replace the two pro-Delta Representatives, John Garamendi and Jerry McNerney, with two candidates more aligned with their effort to drain the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta.
Congressional candidates Kim Vann and Ricky Gill have taken tens of thousands of dollars from the California Westside Farmers PAC and from individual Westlands board members and prominent growers, according to the Federal Election Commission.
Westlands Water District is known for its relentless efforts over the years to stop the restoration of salmon, steelhead, Delta smelt and other fish species on the Sacramento and San Joaquin rivers, its unsuccessful legal campaign to block Trinity River restoration and its current campaign to build the peripheral tunnels.
Westlands growers, their PACs, and their associated growing associations have given at least $35,000 to Congressional Candidate Kim Vann, who is running in California District 3 against incumbent Congressman John Garamendi.
The link to the Vann contributions is: http://www.garamendi.org/sites/default/files/Preview%20of%20%C2%B3Schedule%20A%20for%20ALL%20Line%20%23%27s%C2%B2.pdf
In the California Congressional District 9 race, Westlands, their associated growers associations, and Westlands Board Members have contributed over $14,000 to Congressional Candidate Ricky Gill.
The California Westside Farmers PAC has donated $5,000 to Gill and the California Cotton Growers Association
[Boswell's Enterprise that dried up Tulare Lake, killed over 1 Million fish and flushed out streams]
has contributed an additional $500 to support Gill’s effort to unseat Congressman Jerry McNerney. The link to the Gill contributions is: http://query.nictusa.com/cgi-bin/com_detail/C00079566/
Members of the Westlands Water District's Board of Directors, including Donald Devine, Daniel Errotabere, Frank Coehlo, Gary Esijian and the Woolf Family, contributed an additional $8500 to Gill's campaign.
Donald Devine, through his Double D Farms, contributed $1,000 to Gill (http://images.nictusa.com/cgi-bin/fecimg/?12952458667). Daniel Errotabere, through his Errotabere Ranch, donated $2,500 to Gill’s campaign (http://images.nictusa.com/cgi-bin/fecimg/?12952458671).
Frank Coehlo, Jr. contributed $2,500 through his Cascaca Vineyards (http://images.nictusa.com/cgi-bin/fecimg/?12952458656). Gary Esijian (http://images.nictusa.com/cgi-bin/fecimg/?12952458671) donated $500, while Todd R. Neves (http://images.nictusa.com/cgi-bin/fecimg/?12952458697) contributed $500.
Finally, members of the Woolf family, prominent Westlands growers, contributed $1500 to Gill’s campaign.
The link to the Westlands Water District Board of Directors is: http://www.westlandswater.org/wwd/board.asp?title=Board%20of%20Directors&cwide=1280
Special interests are trying to buy the election
Delta and salmon advocates believe that Westlands funding of Vann’s and Gill’s campaigns represents a blatant attempt to replace Delta Congressional representatives who have opposed Westlands’ Peripheral Tunnels plan with officeholders who’d be more compliant with Westlands’ plans to increase water exports to their drainage-impaired land on the west side of the San Joaquin Valley.
“We hear about special interests trying to buy the political process,” said Dr. Mark Rockwell, California state representative of the Endangered Species Coalition and member of the Northern California Council, Federation of Fly Fishers. “We don't realize that it is happening very close to home. West San Joaquin valley farm interests want more water, and that water must come from the S.F. Bay-Delta, and they know it.”
“They also know that Representatives McNerney and Garamendi stand for protection of Delta communities and Delta farmers, not west San Joaquin farm interests,” said Rockwell. “Their money given to Vann and Gill is done only to ‘buy’their votes to ship water past the Delta, destroying water quality for Delta farmers and communities, and also driving Delta fish species like salmon toward extinction.”
On July 25, 2012, Congressman Garamendi stood on the steps of the Capitol with hundreds of Delta farmers, fishermen, members of the Winnemem Wintu, Pit River and Hoopa Valley Tribes and environmentalists to publically express his opposition to Governor Jerry Brown’s plan to build the peripheral tunnels.
"Today I flew back to California to make it clear to state and federal lawmakers where I stand: the 9,000 cubic feet per second (cfs) conveyance facility being proposed could wreak havoc on the Delta and the jobs it sustains and put existing water rights in the Delta and Northern California at risk," said Garamendi. "It is possible for California to solve its water problems, but the Delta and Northern California counties must be at the table, and it will take a comprehensive, multifaceted approach, not just a piece of plumbing in the Delta."
Congressmen McNerney and Garamendi have co-sponsored a HR 6484, a bill calling for a cost benefit analysis of the proposed tunnel project to be completed by the federal government.
On October 11, McNerney stated, “Not only would a canal destroy the vital estuary that we depend on, it could place an insurmountable burden on users to pay for a plan that was flawed to begin with, setting our state water policy back decades. We will continue to demand a seat at the table and to have a voice in the process."
The same west side growers lobbied heavily against a similar bill authored by Bill Berryhill (R-Modesto) that stalled in the California Assembly during the last California legislative session.
Westlands is not a charity - it expects a return on investment
Advocates for the restoration of California’s struggling salmon and other fish populations note that Westland’s political action committee is not a charity. It invests in those who support its agenda – and expects a return on investment. They are trying to weaken the Delta’s voice in Congress on fair water policy.
Westlands Water District growers have benefited for years from federally subsidized Delta water exports. Now, they are using the profits they have obtained from subsidized water, at tremendous expense to the taxpayers and the environment, to muscle political influence to secure future water supplies.
The peripheral tunnels would deal the final death blow to the Delta’s $5 billion annual agriculture economy, the region’s $650,000,000 recreation economy, and to Delta fisheries, according to Delta and salmon advocates. If built, the peripheral tunnels would hasten the extinction of Central Valley steelhead, Sacramento River chinook salmon, green sturgeon, Delta smelt, longfin smelt, Sacramento splittail and numerous other fish species.
Record amounts of water were exported out of the Delta pumps in 2011 to irrigate land farmed by Westlands and other west side agribusiness interests, including Stewart Resnick's Paramount Farms in Kern County. The massive diversions resulted in the “salvage” of over 11 million fish, including a record 9 million native Sacramento splittail. The construction of the tunnels would only exacerbate the collapse of imperiled fish populations. (http://www.counterpunch.org/2012/05/07/carnage-in-the-pumps)
Delta and salmon advocates believe that regardless of political affiliation, Delta area voters should be outraged that Westlands Water District leaders are trying to buy influence in the Delta to stop the work of two Congressional Representatives, John Garamendi and Jerry McNerney, who have been strong advocates against Westlands’ scheme to build two fish-killing peripheral tunnels.
This government boondoogle, being pushed through Governor Jerry Brown’s Bay Delta Conservation Plan, would divert the majority of the Sacramento River away from the estuary and send it directly to corporate agribusiness interests on the west side of the San Joaquin Valley.
Many Delta residents are now asking: How can they expect a candidate to represent their interests when they are taking money from the California Cotton Growers Association, California Westside Farmers Federal PAC, and Westlands corporate agribusiness leaders - all of whom who have benefited year after year from millions of dollars of federally subsidized water exported from the Delta pumps?
I keep saying that--
Taxpayers and Ratepayers are 'not' ATM Machines!
And after the Oct 9th meeting I feel I have to repeat it more often.
There were two agenda items: Hiring a consultant to fill the District's CPA requirements; and handing over the General Manager ALL Board duties in shelling out the tax & rate payers $$$.
First, looking for a CPA. Can you believe it? The District couldn't find anyone eligible on the Divide to act as a CPA? Really? How did they look? Mary Pat said she looked through her personal file of CPAs that she knew. That's how they looked for CPAs? As a 'Non-Board Member' I don't have the power to question this process. I had already been told by the Board President that I must make my questions short. (They have NEVER been more than one or two sentences, and they are usually a question for the Board to explain.) Well the three ruling Board Members didn't discuss the process, until a gentleman in the audience asked why 'Staff' was accepting a one page email response and the others had detailed information?
The General Manager liked her interview. Well, says current Board Member Norm Krizl, my opponent, "Well if Hank says so, that's all I need." Hank's recommendation was accepted on that.
Second, (The Big One) The Board abdicated all responsibility for the NEW $9 Million project.
The Agenda item said "Adopting Compliance Requirements for Grant." Here is what the Resolution said:
The General Manager -- not the BOARD
Really? The Board gave away all oversight? Remember the $1.1 Million flushed away with the Greenwood Treatment Plant fiasco?
Here we go RATEPAYERS.... more lost funding and the GM will tell the public once again.... Well the Board knew about it.... we didn't have to tell you.... By the way hand over more money for another rate increase... WE ARE NOT ATM MACHINES!
I have studied California's water issues since I was an Agricultural student at Sierra College. I worked at the DWR and presented case-studies in the Industrial Water Management Manual.